Rembrandt Lighting (Video Interview Techniques)

I’m stationed at Combat Camera now.  I’ve been stationed here before, so I know it’s pretty rare to travel with a light kit.  We still have to shoot interviews, and we want those interviews to look as well-lit as possible.  So how do we do that?  My answer is: Rembrandt lighting.

Rembrandt?

Rembrandt Harmenszoon van Rijn was a Dutch painter from the 17th Century [FIGURE 1].  Rembrandt lit his subjects so that one side of the subject’s face was well lit, and the other side of the face was in shadow except for the eye and a small triangle of light under the eye.  The triangle of light is created when the shadow from the nose reaches down to the corner of the mouth and connects with the shadow from the dark side of the face.  And that’s “Rembrandt lighting.”

REMBRANDT diagram

FIGURE 1:
Here is a self-portrait of Rembrandt as a young man. In this painting, the well-lit side of his face is facing the “camera.” When we set up our interviews, we usually want the camera to be facing the shadowy side of the face. See the examples below.

.

Here are some modern examples of Rembrandt lighting at work:

Dramatic Rembrandt

FIGURE 2:
Very dramatic use of Rembrandt. I pulled this picture from Lens Diaries’ great post on Rembrandt lighting. The photo is linked to their post. Check it out.

In the first example [FIGURE 2, above] the Rembrandt lighting is very sharp and defined. You probably wouldn’t use such a dramatic use like this unless your subject matter really warranted some drama.

.

.

Natural Looking Rembrandt

FIGURE 3:
Here is a more subtle use of Rembrandt. I pulled this photo from Louis Daniel Botha’s great post on lighting techniques. Click the photo to check out his blog post. (He uses an awesome WordPress theme)

In this example [FIGURE 3, above] the Rembrandt lighting is less sharp and contrasty.  I’m guessing the photographer used multiple lights on this one, but it is set up to look like it was lit with natural light coming from a window.  In my opinion, unless you’re going for a specific effect, the natural look is the way to go.

How to Do It Yourself

Like I said before, sometimes you just don’t have a light kit, but that doesn’t mean your scene can’t be as well-lit as possible.  Here are four simple steps to help you get better looking interview shots by using availible light to achieve Rembrandt lighting.

1. Find a Light Source and Position the Interviewee:

Find a window, and position your subject so that the light from that window is casting Rembrandt lighting across your subject’s face.  If you’re in a windowless room, try a desk lamp or some other available light source.

2. Position the Reporter Right in Front of the Interviewee:

Your whole set up is based on the available light source. So once your subject is properly lit, you’re not going to want him to move or turn his head to face the reporter asking the questions.  Position the reporter (which is probably you, right?) directly in front of the interviewee, so he stays properly lit while he’s answering your questions.

3. Position the Camera:

Position the camera so that it is on the shadowy side of the interviewee’s face.  If you look at the two Rembrandt examples [FIGURE 2 and FIGURE 3], you’ll see the camera is on the shadow side of the subject’s face.  Shooting the shadowy side of someone’s face has a slimming effect.  Conversely, positioning the camera on the bright side of someone’s face has a broadening effect.  Normally people want to appear slimmer, but there are definitely occasions where you would want to shoot the bright side to make someone’s face fuller.

(note: often the shadowy side is called the “short” side, and the bright side is called the “broad” side, but, whatever…)

4. Don’t Forget the Background:

Make sure your background isn’t too dark or too bright (ie: you don’t want the background brighter than your interview subject.) Sometimes it helps to kill the other lights in the room; sometimes it helps to leave them on or just kill a few. If I’m using a window as my light source, I usually try to kill all the overhead lights and open curtains to light my background. This helps me avoid mixed lighting situations.

Because you built this whole scene based on where the light was coming from, you don’t really get to choose your background composition, so make sure there isn’t anything crazy or distracting in your background.

Interview set up diagram

FIGURE 4:
Here is a diagram of how this set up would look from the top. We’ve got light coming in from a window creating Rembrandt on our interview subject. The reporter is standing right in front of the properly lit subject. The camera is pointed at the shadow (or “short”) side of the subject’s face.

That’s All Folks

Using available light to achieve Rembrandt lighting on your subject will give your video that extra touch of professionalism.  We can’t all roll around with light kits, flags and reflectors, but using this simple technique will up the production value of your interview footage.


After Effects tips [part 2: basic organization tip]

Opening Shots:

In this post I want to talk about an organizing structure for anything bigger than the most simple After Effects projects. This is a basic concept that I didn’t know about since I’m pretty new to After Effects.

When I started this CNO Tenets project, I was having problems organizing the whole thing. I was trying to build everything in one composition (comp), but the comp got crazy really fast. I asked my coworker, After Effects Ninja Nate Quinn (quinngraphicdesign.com), for advice.  He suggested I use one composition as a “stage.” He said I should build all my individual elements in their own little comps, and then, drop those comps onto the Stage Comp.  Using a Stage Comp not only keeps things organized, but it also makes life a lot easier when you have to make changes to your project late in the process.

Stage Composition:

Let’s look at the first 15 seconds of the CNO Tenet project. What’s going on in the first 15 seconds?

First, there is a black and white image of a couple of ships; this image serves as a background for this scene.

Second, there are picture panels of the Chief of Naval Operations testifying before congress.

Third, there is a text animation that IDs the CNO as Adm. Jonathan Greenert.

Fourth, there is a camera movement that transitions the viewer from this scene to the next scene (the text animation of the three tenets.)

.

.

01 Stage Simple.

Here is what the first 15 seconds looks like in the Stage Comp. There are four elements and a camera.

.

.

.

I created each of the elements in its own composition, and then I dropped each of them onto the Stage Comp.  Each element can have tons of layers with its own cameras and movements, but when I drop the comps onto the main Stage Comp, they’re in neat, self-contained comps.

05 stage n thumbnails.

.

This is what the first 15 seconds would look like if I put everything in the same comp instead of using a Stage Comp.

02 No StageSo, that’s it. By using a Stage Comp, I can keep my project clean and more manageable. And when your PAO decides that he doesn’t like a particular element or scene, it’s pretty easy to swap that element out of the Stage Comp.

Thanks for reading. I know this was a really basic concept, but it’s definitely changed the way I work, and I’ve shown it to some of my co-workers who are also new to AE, and they’ve found it really helpful, too. Pass it on to a newbie.

-bc


After Effects tips [part 1: "3D" objects in AE cs5.5]

I plan on doing a few posts based on After Effects tips I learned while working on this multimedia project. In this post I want to talk about  how to import and work with 3D objects in After Effects.

3d in AE 5.5:

Alright, so this trick doesn’t work in CS6. So, if you’re rolling with the latest and greatest, don’t bother reading this post.

FREE 3D Models: The green Arleigh Burke destroyer that moves onto the green map at :36 is a 3D model that I got for free from the Google Sketchup Warehouse.  My homie Marine Staff Sgt. Jason Fudge (http://vimeo.com/user2450985) first turned me on to Sketchup Warehouse. If you’re not familiar with it, check it out; it’s an amazing FREE resource.  I just typed “US Navy Destroyer” into the Sketchup search bar, and this model by TOBY and APA-168 popped up.

With Sketchup Warehouse, you can download a .SKP file or a zipped .DAE file. I downloaded the .DEA and unzipped it.  Then, I open the .DAE in Photoshop 5.5 (it’s actually 5.1, but it came w/ CS5.5). Next, I saved the file as a .PSD.  Once the object is a .PSD, it can be imported into After Effects.

.

.

Trouble Shooting: If you open the .DAE in Photoshop and don't see anything, open the 3D Scene window and find a setting that works in the "Render Settings" dropdown menu.

Trouble Shooting: If you open the .DAE in Photoshop and don’t see anything, open the 3D Scene window and find a setting that works in the “Render Settings” dropdown menu.

Trouble Shooting: O.K., so sometimes, it’s not that easy. This destroyer model was one of those times. When I opened the .DAE in Photoshop, I couldn’t see it. So, this is what I did.  In Photoshop, I highlighted the “Window” dropdown menu, and chose “3D.” This brings up the “3D Scene” window. In this window, the “Render Settings” dropdown menu has a bunch of different options to try. For this particular model, I chose the “Normals” render setting to end up with this funky neon destroyer. The colors here don’t really matter because I can desaturate it or adjust the hue in After Effects. At this point, I just save as a .PSD and move on to After Effects.

.

.

… the ability to import Live Photoshop 3D is what changed between CS5.5 and CS6. For whatever reason, CS6 got rid of this option …

.

AE import dialog box.

.

.

.

Importing Into AE: Import the .PSD into the After Effects project as a “Composition,” not as footage. A second dialog pops up after you hit OK. In this dialog box, make sure you’re still importing as a composition with editable layer styles. The most important thing here is to make sure the “Live Photoshop 3D” option is checked. The ability to import Live Photoshop 3D is what changed between CS5.5 and CS6. For whatever reason, CS6 got rid of this option.

.

.

.

.

Animating the Object in AE:  Once the “3D” object is in AE, you end up with a Composition and a folder with the Layers for that Comp.  Inside that Comp, there is a “Layer,” a “Layer Controller,” and a “Camera.”  Inside this Comp is where you’ll animate any motion you want the object to perform, because inside this Comp is the only place where the object will be 3D. The Layer Controller and the Camera position is what you’ll use to animate. If you look at the screen shot below, you’ll see that for this particular animation, I used the Camera position to create the “pull back/zoom out” that starts the animation, and then I used the Layer Controller’s “Y Rotation” to make the 90 degree rotation at the end of the animation.

01 controller n cam

Finishing Up:  When the core animation was done, I just dropped this Comp into another Comp and started building the greenish effect that I ended up with. I’m not going to get into the details about how I made the greenish look, but if you type “Night Vision” into the “Effects and Presets” tab, you’ll be off and running. I want to repeat the fact that I drop this Comp into another Comp BEFORE I start putting effects onto it.  Trust me on this one, if you work this way, it’ll be a lot easier to make changes later on.  I’ll cover “project organization” in another post.

-bc


Standard News Package — Science Awards

This is a standard news package, and at the Pentagon Bureau, we shoot a TON of these.  They’re boring as hell, they’re not very visual, and they are usually on topics that one could care less about.  As lame as this sounds, I try to approach these things like a challenge: How can I make the coolest, most professional looking product out of this award ceremony/wreath laying/plaque dedication/whatever?

In this package, I opened with a reporter stand up.  I really don’t like doing these because I’m a little self-conscious about my delivery.  With a story like this, however, there really aren’t enough good visuals to carry the piece, so having me in the beginning takes up a little bit of screen time.  I also feel like it gives the piece a little immediacy.  I use the present-progressive tense in my lead (“… the Navy IS awarding its top scientists …).  By having me on the scene and using the present progressive, I’m trying to give the viewer that “breaking news” feel.  Hopefully that adds a little bit of excitement to a boring award ceremony package.

Workflow

So what’s the workflow for a piece like this? Well, we start planning as soon as we get the tasking to cover the event.  Here are the steps we took planning and executing this shoot:

-Get a list of the awardees being recognized.  From that list, we isolate one or two of the awardees who have done VISUALLY EXCITING things.  Our plan is to interview these folks, and use some B-roll of their visually exciting work to make our package more entertaining.  For this event, we chose the Rail Gun team, and another team that didn’t make the final edit.

-Write the script.  With an event like this we have time to craft the script, and it usually doesn’t change that much.  We think of what soundbites we want from the interviews, then we craft questions to elicit those soundbites. Sometimes we get the predictible soundbites, sometimes we get better ones.

-On the day of the shoot, we brought two cameras to this event.  A Sony F350, which is a big broadcast camera that is good for shooting Main Cam (the podium shot for the 1st soundbite of ASN Stackley).  We also brought a Canon 7D DSLR.  With these events, I end up shooting Cut Cam, but I’m also the official event photographer for grip ‘n grins, so the DSLR is the all-in-one machine that I need to accomplish my mission.

-We set the Main Cam up first, so we are ready to roll when the event starts.

-Then we set up and shoot my stand up with the DSLR.

-After the stand up, my partner, MC2 Alexandra Snyder, goes and finds our interviewee while I re-adjust the camera composition and our lights so the interview doesn’t look exactly like my stand up.

-We shoot the interview.  It goes great, and then it’s time for the show to start.

-Snyder operated the Main Cam for this shoot.  Main Cam usually stays focused on the podium, or the main action on stage.

-I shot Cut Cam.  The cuts are what make my package, so I’m shooting non-stop (plus I’m shooting the still photos for the event). Usually, whoever is shooting cuts is also going to edit the product in post.

The Edit

Ok, so let’s talk about editing this thing, and how we use Main Cam and Cut Cam to stitch together sequences for the final product.

Podium Sequence

Right after my stand up, we have a Cut Cam shot of the speaker at the podium.  The audio under that shot is still the narration from my stand up.  The next shot is the soundbite of the speaker at the podium; this is from Main Cam.  This gives us a nice little two-shot sequence.  The Cut Cam shot leads the viewer into the soundbite.  We get this shot by design.  If you notice, the action matches up pretty well from the Cut Cam shot to the podium shot.  To make sure the editor can get that matching action,  Cut Cam has to capture a full range of the speaker’s motion.  He looks left, he looks right, he talks with his hands . I captured that Cut Cam shot for almost a full minute to make sure I would be able to roughly match action with whatever soundbite I used from Main Cam.

“I captured that Cut Cam shot for almost a full minute to make sure I would be able to roughly match action with whatever soundbite I used from Main Cam.”

Rail Gun Sequence

The next sequence is of the audience watching Rail Gun test footage.  We got lucky that they played this video at the ceremony.  We had already downloaded the video from DVIDS, and we were planning on using it to spice up our package.  Since they played the video for the audience, we were able to sequence it.  This sequence goes from Main Cam to a shaky, awkward Cut Cam shot, and then we use the actual footage we got from DVIDS.

Next, we go into our interview soundbite. How we chose this soundbite out of the all the great stuff she gave us would take up a whole blog-post, so I’ll just say this: her soundbite adds “color” to the line of narration that I read just before the soundbite. In my narration I explain that the Rail Gun uses electricity to launch projectiles, and her soundbite implies that using electricity is a really major step forward.

In Closing

Finally, we finish with my standard lame-ceremony closing sequence of applause.  As everyone knows, video rules say an editor should finish a piece with “negative action.” Applause is my negative/closing action.  I actually get the applause sequence in the beginning of the ceremony.  These ceremonies always start with the MC or the keynote speaker thanking a host of people.  This part of the ceremony is useless, so I use it as an opportunity to catch the applause sequence.

These ceremonies always start with the MC or the keynote speaker thanking a host of people.  This part of the ceremony is useless, so I use it as an opportunity to catch the applause sequence.

This piece isn’t going to win any cool-guy awards, but for the past 6 months, these stories have made up 85 percent of my workload.  So, since these pieces are the bread and butter that pay my mortgage and feed my children, I really have no choice but to try and make them as good as I can.

If you like this post, follow me on Twitter.  My handle is @bpcote1 and I post mostly about mass comm subjects. You can also friend my professional facebook page: Cote Brett.

-bc


Non Narrative — Culinary Specialist

My workload at the Pentagon is kind of erratic.  When we’re busy, I can barely come up for air.  Some days, however, I don’t have any official tasking, so I always have a side-project in production. This piece was one of those.  I did it for my command’s daily product All Hands Update (AHU).

Side-projects are cool because they give me a chance to use work hours to put something out with as little interference as possible.  I did call Naval Supply Command’s strategic communications office to see what kind of messaging they would be interested in seeing, but other than that, I didn’t have any public affairs to worry about.  The messaging that NAVSUP was looking for was “an experienced CS bringing knowledge back to the ship to train fellow CSs.”

I shot this over 2 days, plus one afternoon interview.  I guess that’s a lot of shooting for a 2-minute AHU, but like I said, this is a side-project and I can take the time to do it the way I want, because I’m working  on days when we don’t have other “official” tasking.

One of the critiques that I got on this piece was that the noise of the kitchen fan was too much. I agree.  I wish I could’ve turned off the fan when we did the interview after hours, but we couldn’t. And until the recent firmware update, my Canon 7D had auto gain, so when the interviewee would stop talking, the mic would start turning up the volume on the kitchen fan.  Yea, it sorta sucked.

Overall, I’m happy with the piece.  It’s just a short little AHU, but I think I told a fairly honest and entertaining two minutes while mixing in some messaging.

Workflow:

Picking My Subject:

We (Defense Media Activity) had been getting the message that Navy leadership wanted to put a spotlight on Culinary Specialists.  So, when I was looking for a side project, CSs seemed like a visual topic that would also scratch a Navy public affairs itch.  Working in the Pentagon, there are a lot of top-notch military chefs/cooks, so I just had to find one to highlight.

I bumped into CS1 Reia Davis in the hallway one day.  Later that week, she took me around to all the kitchens in the Pentagon and introduced me to a lot of CSs.  She didn’t really want to be the subject of my piece, but after spending the day with her showing me around, I really felt comfortable with her.  I also liked her pedigree.  Let me explain that.  Working in the Pentagon is a “special program” for CSs.  A lot of the CSs in the Pentagon have been working in the special programs community for most of their careers.  They are extremely good at what they do, but they are a little out of touch with the Fleet.  CS1 Davis, on the other hand, is a Fleet Sailor.  She comes from the amphib community, and after this tour at the Pentagon, she’ll probably head back to an amphib.  She isn’t one of these super-chefs who has been to all the schools and competed in all the cooking competitions her whole career.  She’s just a shit-hot Fleet Sailor who was good enough to get into special programs.  She was a good, honest fit to illustrate one of the messaging goals that NAVSUP was looking to communicate ( “an experienced CS bringing knowledge back to the ship to train fellow CSs.”)   The ability to tell a little more of an honest story is one of the reasons I love doing side projects, so whether she liked it or not, Davis became the subject of my story. (Thanks Reia!)

Shooting:

Shooting in the Secretary of Defense’s kitchen requires jumping through some hoops.  I won’t bore you with the process.

I spent two days shooting the b-roll.  The kitchen is pretty small.  I tried to use a tripod as much as possible, but I had to go off-sticks for most of the shots.  Luckily, After Effects 5.5 has a bad-ass stabilizer that works wonders for reasonable hand-held shake.  I’ll talk some more about that in post production.

“Throwing a new lens on a camera in the middle of a shoot is like getting a fresh shot of creativity right when you think you’ve shot everything you can shoot.”

I used the Canon 7D and the Nikon D3s.  The Canon is mine.  It shoots 1920 x 1080 at 30 frames per second.  The picture is beautiful and I love it, but I only own two lenses.  The Nikon is my command’s.  Its video isn’t so hot (1280 x 720 at 24fps) but I have a great quiver of lenses for it, so it comes in really handy.  Being a legacy JO and a bit of a video specialist, I never really got too familiar with dslr cameras until they started shooting video.  So I never realized how awesome it is to have multiple lenses.  Throwing a new lens on a camera in the middle of a shoot is like getting a fresh shot of creativity right when you think you’ve shot everything you can shoot.  In a tight spot like the kitchen, the fish-eye lens was a god-sent.

I shot the interview with the Canon as the main cam.  I used the D3s with a telephoto lens to get that alternative 45% angle.  I like shooting an interview with two cameras for two reasons.  First, I just like the way that alternative angle looks.  Second, having two angles on an interview lets me chop up a soundbite without creating a jumpcut and without laying b-roll over it.  It just gives me more options in post production. One disadvantage is that it can be tough to match up the look of the two different cameras. I end up having to muck-up the 7D image to match the D3s.  The two cameras just see light in different ways (not to mention that the D3s shots have been resized to full HD.)

Post Production:

The post production on this one was a pretty straight forward edit job.  The three main things I’d like to point out are: 1. The tri-fold shot at the start  2. Working with sound   3. Stabilizing shots with After Effects.

“I totally didn’t realize that I hadn’t gotten a solid opener”

The three-shot split-screen at the beginning of the piece is pretty cool, right?  Wrong.  I had to resort to that trickery because I wasn’t smart enough to shoot an opening shot.  I really feel like you have to open with a cool shot.  Usually my openers are visually-interesting long shots.  In that kitchen it was pretty tough to get a decent long shot, and I totally didn’t realize that I hadn’t gotten a solid opener.  On the same note, I really didn’t get a decent closer.

I think the split screen is pretty cool, and I think it worked out well.  But I think what really made it work was the audio.  The audio is the second thing I want to talk about.  I always pay a lot of attention to audio in post production, but in this piece I had to pay a little more attention because of that ever-present kitchen fan.

Most of the audio under the opener isn’t actually the audio from those shots.  The water faucet audio is legit, but the chopping audio is actually me tapping a pen on a desk, and I recorded the sizzling frying pan audio at my house.  There are two reasons why I didn’t use the actual camera audio.  First, the chopping and the frying were shot from relatively far away, so my mic didn’t pick up the best sound.  Second, that kitchen fan was in every shot, so if you layered three shots over each other, the fan’s sound would start to compound and overpower all the other sound.

Just another note on sound: if you take a listen to the piece, I think you’ll see that I try to weave the nat sound though out the piece.  You’ll also notice that I use nat sound to signal to the viewer that the piece is coming to a close.  Davis says something like “order up,” or whatever.  I did this because, like I said, I was too stupid to shoot an actual closing shot.

The last thing that I want to talk about is stabilizing shaky shots with After Effects 5.5′s Warp Stabilizer effect.  I’m not going to get into the nuts and bolts of how to use the tool, but I’ll tell you what it does.  If you’ve got a shot that is a little shaky, Warp Stabilizer moves the shot around to counter the shake.  Since the effect is moving the shot (to keep the shot still … crazy, right?), it has to resize the image so that the viewer doesn’t see the edges of the shot moving within the visible frame.  The reason I mention the resize is that if you’re working with poor footage or footage that has already been resized ( like my D3s footy) then you’re going to see the degredation that you typically get from resizing footage.

In Closing:

Alright, so that’s that.  I appreciate you reading, and I hope you’ve got something from this.  If you want to contact me, feel free to friend me on facebook, and if you are into geeking out on media stuff, you should follow me on Twitter for a couple of cool links a week. Thanks again,

-bc


Multi Media – Aquisition Awards

So, I’m stationed, with my partner MC2 Alexandra Snyder, at the Pentagon. We get tasked with all kinds of boring award ceremonies.

I was tasked to take photos of this ceremony.  I had to shoot all the grip n’ grins, and I also had to get a few good candids for Navy.mil.

I’ve been learning After Effects, and I decided to grab an interview and shoot the ceremony with my mind on producing a multi media piece.

I shot the photos and the video on a Canon 7D, and I recorded the audio on a Zoom H4n.

enjoy.    -bc


2011 Sailors of the Year

First thing you need to know about this piece is that it is a complete rip-off of the piece Andrew Breese put together last year.  Our customer for this was CHINFO’s social media department.  The customer sent me a link to last year’s piece (vimeo.com/23981915) and said he wanted a “bucketfull of this.” So, I lifted the concept and  a lot of Breese’s shots outright.

MC2 Alexandra Snyder was my partner on this project.  The two of us were slated to handle all the products for the sailors of the year (SOY) week.  There were multiple products (print, video, multimedia, stills) and most of them were due under pretty tight deadlines.  So, we did as much pre-production work as possible.  For this multimedia piece, any shot that didn’t have the SOYs, we shot a week or two before the actual shoot day.  Breese’s piece had the SOYs outdoors at the Navy Memorial, so we shot the pre-production shots on a clear morning and a cloudy morning.  That way we’d be able to match the footage with the conditions on the morning of our scheduled Navy Memorial shoot with the SOYs.  The morning of the shoot, it ended up raining cats and dogs, so we actually ended up shooting the SOYs inside the Navy Memorial’s Heritage center.

here’s a screen shot of the Sony F350 ENG footage.

here’s a screen shot of the Canon 7D footage.

We shot the interviews the first day the SOYs were in town.  Navy Visual News Services has a really small office that doubles as a studio.  The Friday before the interviews MC2 Snyder went to NVNS to get the lights just right for the interviews.  Jon Snyder, MC2′s husband works at NVNS.  He’s a really talented videographer, and he knows a lot about setting up production lighting.  I knew I wanted that dark, contrasty look to the interviews, and Jon helped us get that look.  We set up 3-point lighting with a Lowell light kit and a couple of flags to keep the key light from lighting up the curtain in the background.  MC2 asked the questions and I worked the cameras.  We used a big Sony ENG cam as the main cam, and we also used my Canon 7D to shoot the side angle.  The 7D’s footage is so much richer than the ENG, but I just bumped up the saturation a little in post, and the two pictures match up pretty well.

Like I said, this is just a knock off of last year’s piece. What we did different is the “messaging.” I put effort into making the piece revolve around the kool-aid dujour, which is the CNO’s three tenets (be ready, operate forward, warfighting first). I tried to weave the kool-aid in with out hitting the viewer over the head with it and while keeping the hooya-navy-good-feeling that I thought Breese’s piece did so well.

I did the final edit in Avid. This ended up tripping me up a little.  Whenever I work in Avid, I export my final product as an MXF file.  The thing about MXFs is that they support eight tracks of audio.  Unfortunately, YouTube only supports two tracks of audio.  I didn’t do an audio mixdown to two tracks, so most of my audio was on tracks 1 and 2, but my music and all my little extras were on 3, 4, and 5.  I uploaded to CHINFO’s YouTube page, marked it “private,” sent out a delivery email to the customer, and I went home (it was about 2200 by that point).  Long story shorter, by the time I realized what had happened, 1,500 people saw the version with no music or audio enhancements.  That sucked.  So, there’s a version out there with no music.  Don’t watch it.

I’d like to give a special thanks to MCPON’s photographer, MC2 Thomas Rosprim. This dude helped us out so much.  We used to be at West Coast Combat Camera together back in the day, and it was amazing to see what a polished public affairs guy he has become (and I mean that in a good way ;-> )  Thanks Rosey.

-bc

120514-N-IV546-211
WASHINGTON (May. 14, 2012) Mass Communication Specialist 1st class Brett Cote, of Defense Media Activity, lights Aircrew Survival Equipmentman 1st class Maria Johnson, Chief of Naval Operations (CNO) Sailor of the Year, for a video interview. Four Sailors of the Year will be meritoriously promoted to chief petty officer at an advancement ceremony at week’s end. (U.S. Navy photo by Mass Communication Specialist 2nd Class Thomas L. Rosprim/Released)


Uploading Stills to Navy Visual News (navy.mil photo gallery)

My coworker, MC2 Alexandra Snyder, and I have spent the last couple of weeks standing up a Navy Pentagon bureau for the Defense Media Activity (DMA).  Today Alex is out on the Pentagon bureau’s first assignment.  I’m home recovering from some minor surgery. So, as is often the case, the E-5 is out getting the job done while the E-6 is sitting around talking about it.

Al is out at the Sea, Air, and Space Expo (SASE) getting still photos for navy.mil.  I’m sure most of you are well-versed in getting photos to Navy Visual News, but Al and I weren’t.  We found instructions here:  http://www.navy.mil/photo_submit.asp, and we ran a couple of tests.  Here are the steps we followed:

1. We shot the highest resolution JPEG as possible with our Nikon D3.

2. We named the photos with VIRINs.  If you don’t know what’s up with VIRINs, check out that navy.mil link; it breaks it down for you.

3. We captioned the photos.  We used Adobe Bridge to put the caption information into the metadata.  If for some reason you don’t have Bridge, but you have Photoshop, go to “File > File Info.”  You can enter metadata in there.  The folks at Navy Visual News told us that they prefer if shooters use a program called Photo Mechanic to enter the metadata.

4. We also put the caption info into a Word document.

5. We e-mailed the photos and the caption-info Word document to: navymedia@navy.mil

6. After we sent the email(s) we called Oscar Sosa, the photo boss over at Navy Visual News, and gave him the heads up that the photos were on the way.

Mr. Sosa gave us a tip about file size.  If you’re out on a ship or in the field, and you’re having trouble sending huge JPGs, he said to save the JPGs at a lower Image Quality level.  When you save JPGs in Photoshop, the program asks you what quality you want to save at.  Sosa suggested reducing file size by saving at Quality Level 8 instead of 12.

So that’s that.  I’ll post some of Al’s pics from the expo later.

-bc


MilC digital Welcome Post

Welcome to MilC digital.  I’m MC1 Brett Cote, and this is my foray into the world of blogging.  I’m going to focus on all things MC and my opinions on those things.

I’m not personally inclined to blog, but the tools of our trade are changing really fast.  So, this is part of my effort to stay current on all the mass comm skills and tools.

I’m going to try to keep my posts casual and conversational.  I apologize in advance to my legacy JO brethren, because I will definitely be straying from AP Style; lo siento hermanos.

If you dig what I’m laying down here, you might want to follow me on Twitter (@bpcote1).  Most of my tweets are retweets of the media pros who I follow (along with my daily Instagram fix.  Sorry, but I love that app.)

One final note:  I want to thank MC3 Glenn Slaughter (USS Nimitz) for inspiring me to start a blog.  He does an MC-centric blog called “I am your eyes” (http://usnavymc.blogspot.com/).  Check it out.

-bc


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.